Audit of Final Voucher
TIRNO-95-D-00058
Task Order Number 2
December 2001
Reference
Number: 2002-1C-031
This report has cleared the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration disclosure review process and information determined to be restricted from public release has been redacted from this document.
December 11, 2001
MEMORANDUM FOR DAVID A. GRANT
DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
FROM: (for) Pamela J. Gardiner /s/ Michael R.
Phillips
Deputy Inspector General for
Audit
SUBJECT: Audit of Final Voucher: TIRNO-95-D-00058, Task Order Number 2 (Audit
#200210002.011)
The Defense
Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) examined the final voucher issued under contract
number TIRNO-95-D-00058, task order number 2, to verify the contractor’s
assertion that claimed cost represents allowable cost and fee under the task
order. The DCAA examined the
contractor’s accounting records and reviewed the financial operating procedures
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the data and records are free of
material misstatement.
In summary,
the DCAA report indicated that the final voucher is acceptable for
processing. The costs on the final
voucher are considered allowable.
The
information in this report should not be used for purposes other than that
intended without prior consultation with the Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration regarding its applicability.
If you have any questions, please
contact me at (202) 622-6510 or Daniel R. Devlin, Assistant Inspector General
for Audit (Headquarters Operations and Exempt Organizations Programs), at (202)
622-8500.
Attachment
NOTICE:
The Office of Inspector General for Tax Administration has
no objection to the release of this report, at the discretion of the
contracting officer, to duly authorized representatives of the contractor.
The contractor information contained in this report is
proprietary information. The
restrictions of 18 USC 1905 must be followed in releasing any information to
the public.
This report may not be released without the approval of
this office, except to an agency requesting the report for use in negotiating
or administering a contract with the contractor.
The TIGTA seal was removed due to its size.