Audit of Final Voucher TIRNO-95-D-00057, Task Order Number IR-96-NO-3238
Reference Number: 2003-1C-032
This report has cleared the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration disclosure review process and information determined to be restricted from public release has been redacted from this document.
December 2, 2002
MEMORANDUM FOR DAVID A. GRANT
DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
FROM: Daniel R. Devlin /s/ Daniel R. Devlin
Assistant Inspector General for Audit (Headquarters Operations
and Exempt Organizations Programs)
SUBJECT: Audit of Final Voucher TIRNO-95-D-00057, Task Order Number IR-96-NO-3238 (Audit #200310002.015)
In response to your request, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) examined the final voucher issued for task order number IR-96-NO-3238 under contract number TIRNO-95-D-00057. The purpose of the examination was to determine the allowable cost and fee for the subject task order under the contract.
In summary, the contractor’s accounting and billing systems are generally considered adequate to ensure final vouchers are based on allowable cost and fee data. The DCAA indicated that the final voucher issued under the task order is acceptable for processing. The claimed costs are considered allowable for this task order under the contract and, therefore, are reimbursable.
The information in this report should not be used for purposes other than that intended without prior consultation with the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration regarding its applicability.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (202) 622-8500 or John R. Wright, Director at (202) 927-7077.
The Office of Inspector General for Tax Administration has no objection to the release of this report, at the discretion of the contracting officer, to duly authorized representatives of the contractor.
The contractor information contained in this report is proprietary information. The restrictions of 18 USC 1905 must be followed in releasing any information to the public.
This report may not be released without the approval of this office, except to an agency requesting the report for use in negotiating or administering a contract with the contractor.
The TIGTA seal was removed due to its size.