Audit of Final Vouchers
TIRNO-95-D-00065, Task Order Numbers 0001 and 0021
December 2002
Reference
Number: 2003-1C-036
This report has
cleared the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration disclosure review
process and information determined to be restricted from public release has
been redacted from this document.
December 23, 2002
MEMORANDUM FOR DAVID A. GRANT
DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
FROM: Daniel R. Devlin /s/ Daniel R. Devlin
Assistant Inspector General
for Audit (Headquarters Operations
and Exempt Organizations
Programs)
SUBJECT: Audit of Final Vouchers TIRNO-95-D-00065, Task Order Numbers 0001 and 0021 (Audit #200310002.017)
In response to
your request, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) examined the final
vouchers issued for task order numbers 0001 and 0021 under contract number
TIRNO-95-D-00065. The purpose of the
examination was to determine the allowable costs and fees under the task
orders.
In summary,
the contractor’s accounting and billing systems are generally considered
adequate to ensure final vouchers are based on allowable cost and fee
data. The DCAA indicated that the final
vouchers issued under the task orders are acceptable for processing. The claimed costs are considered allowable
under the contract, and therefore are reimbursable.
The
information in this report should not be used for purposes other than that
intended without prior consultation with the Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration regarding its applicability.
If you have any questions, please
contact me at (202) 622-8500 or John R. Wright, Director at (202) 927-7077.
Attachment
NOTICE:
The Office of Inspector General for Tax Administration has
no objection to the release of this report, at the discretion of the
contracting officer, to duly authorized representatives of the contractor.
The contractor information contained in this report is
proprietary information. The
restrictions of 18 USC 1905 must be followed in releasing any information to
the public.
This report may not be released without the approval of
this office, except to an agency requesting the report for use in negotiating
or administering a contract with the contractor.
The TIGTA seal was removed due
to its size.