Report on Examination of
Direct and Indirect Costs and Rates for Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2000
December 2003
Reference
Number: 2004-1C-021
This report has cleared the Treasury Inspector General For
Tax Administration disclosure review process and information determined to be
restricted from public release has been redacted from this document.
December 5, 2003
MEMORANDUM FOR DAVID A. GRANT
DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
FROM: Daniel R. Devlin /s/ Daniel R. Devlin
Assistant Inspector General
for Audit (Headquarters Operations and
Exempt Organizations Programs)
SUBJECT: Report on Examination of Direct and
Indirect Costs and Rates for Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2000 (Audit #20041C0212)
The
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) examined the contractor’s December 6,
2001, certified final indirect cost rate proposal and related books and records
for reimbursement of Fiscal Year (FY) 2000 incurred costs. The purpose of the examination was to
determine the allowability and allocability of direct costs and indirect cost
rates and to establish audit-determined indirect cost rates for April 1, 1999,
through March 31, 2000. The proposed
rates apply primarily to flexibly priced contracts.
The
DCAA questioned costs of approximately $10.3 million in the contractor’s
claimed labor overhead and general and administrative (G&A) expenses. The questioned costs include approximately
$7.8 million in claimed executive compensation costs for the contractor’s FY
2000. The DCAA indicated that the
questioned costs resulted from a comparison of executives’ compensation to
comparable executive positions published in executive market pay surveys. The DCAA questioned the executive
compensation costs based on application of the reasonableness criteria of the
Federal Acquisition Regulation Part 31.
The questioned costs also include $1.8 million in claimed corporate
residual G&A cost. This questioned
cost is a result of the DCAA’s reconciliation of claimed corporate allocations
to the contractor’s FY 2000 corporate audit report.
Additionally,
the DCAA applied an upward adjustment to the claimed G&A base. The contractor concurred with all the
questioned/upward-adjusted cost except for the approximately $7.8 million in
executive compensation and its effect on allowable overhead allocations to the
G&A pool.
The
DCAA opined that the contractor’s proposed indirect rates, subject to the
qualifications discussed below, are not acceptable as proposed. However, claimed direct costs, subject to
the qualifications discussed below, are provisionally approved pending final
acceptance.
The
DCAA qualified its audit report because results of the assist audits for the
subcontract costs had not been received.
The results of the assist audits may disclose additional questioned
costs. Also, the DCAA indicated that
the contractor’s home office has been cited as being in noncompliance with Cost
Accounting Standard 405 for failing to identify and exclude expressly
unallowable costs from its incurred cost submission. A final determination on this noncompliance may lead to
additional questioned costs.
Additionally, the DCAA stated that subsequent audits or reviews on
insurance, pension, and other fringe benefits may supplement the findings in
this report.
Although
this DCAA report is dated March 29, 2002, we did not receive a copy of the
report until November 2003. Neither the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) nor the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration
(TIGTA) are shown on the DCAA report distribution list, even though
IRS-administered contracts were included in the scope of the DCAA report.
The
information in this report should not be used for purposes other than those
intended without prior consultation with the TIGTA regarding their
applicability.
If you have any questions, please
contact me at (202) 622-8500 or John R. Wright, Director, at (202) 927-7077.
Attachment
NOTICE:
The Office of Inspector General for Tax Administration has
no objection to the release of this report, at the discretion of the
contracting officer, to duly authorized representatives of the contractor.
The contractor information contained in this report is
proprietary information. The
restrictions of 18 U.S.C. § 1905 must be followed in
releasing any information to the public.
This report may not be released without the approval of
this office, except to an agency requesting the report for use in negotiating
or administering a contract with the contractor.
The TIGTA seal was removed due
to its size.