Incurred Costs Audit for Fiscal Year Ended March 31,
2003
June
2005
Reference Number: 2005-1C-060
This report has cleared
the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration disclosure review process
and information determined to be restricted from public release has been
redacted from this document.
June 28, 2005
MEMORANDUM FOR DAVID A. GRANT
DIRECTOR OF PROCUREMENT
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
FROM: Daniel R. Devlin /s/ Daniel R. Devlin
Assistant Inspector General
for Audit (Headquarters Operations and
Exempt Organizations Programs)
SUBJECT: Incurred Costs Audit for Fiscal Year Ended
March 31, 2003 (Audit #20051C0217)
The Defense
Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) examined the contractor’s December 12, 2003,
certified final indirect cost rate proposal and related books and records for
reimbursement of Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 incurred costs. The purpose of the examination was to
determine the allowability of direct and indirect costs and to establish audit determined
indirect cost rates for April 1, 2002, through March 31, 2003. The proposed rates apply primarily to
flexibly priced contracts.
The DCAA
questioned $30,569,509 of the contractor’s claimed overhead and general and
administrative (G&A) expenses. The
contractor has agreed to all questioned costs except for $22,898,694 of
questioned executive compensation and $823,699 of questioned overhead effect on
the G&A. Also, the DCAA questioned
$4,695,924 in claimed pension cost.
According to the DCAA, this questioned cost is the result of their
reconciliation of the claimed pension costs to the contractor’s pension
policies and procedures.
The DCAA
opined that the contractor’s indirect rates are not acceptable as proposed. However, claimed direct costs, except for the
qualifications discussed above, are acceptable and provisionally approved
pending final acceptance. The DCAA
indicated the questioned indirect costs are subject to the penalties provided
in Federal Acquisition Regulation 42.709.
The DCAA
classified the subcontract costs for FY 2003 as unresolved, pending receipt of
requested assist audits. Also, the contractor’s
home office has been cited for a noncompliance with Cost Accounting Standard
405 for failing to identify and exclude expressly unallowable costs from its
incurred cost submission. Therefore, the
audit results are qualified to the extent that a final determination on this
noncompliance may lead to additional questioned costs.
The
information in this report should not be used for purposes other than those intended
without prior consultation with the Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration regarding their applicability.
If you have any questions, please
contact me at (202) 622-8500 or John R. Wright, Director at (202) 927-7077.
Attachment
NOTICE:
The Office of Inspector General for Tax Administration has
no objection to the release of this report, at the discretion of the
contracting officer, to duly authorized representatives of the contractor.
The contractor information contained in this report is
proprietary information. The
restrictions of 18 U.S.C. § 1905 must be followed in
releasing any information to the public.
This report may not be released without the approval of
this office, except to an agency requesting the report for use in negotiating
or administering a contract with the contractor.
The TIGTA seal was removed due to its size.