TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX
ADMINISTRATION
TAXPAYER SERVICE SAVINGS ESTIMATES
FOR FISCAL YEARS 2006 AND 2007 COULD NOT BE VALIDATED
Issued on August 13, 2007
Highlights
Highlights of
Report Number: 2007-40-125 to the
Internal Revenue Service Commissioner for the Wage and Investment Division.
IMPACT ON TAXPAYERS
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) estimated it would
achieve more than $160 million in Taxpayer Service savings from various
reengineering and improvement projects and program efficiency initiatives to
support the decrease in funding for Taxpayer Service in Fiscal Years 2006 and
2007. Neither the estimates nor the
achievements could be validated. When
budget savings are estimated without an adequate analysis of the effect on the
level of taxpayer service, the resulting budgets may not provide the resources
needed to provide sufficient service.
This can also affect other IRS operations because funds must be later
shifted between programs to meet operational requirements.
WHY TIGTA DID THE AUDIT
Approximately
87 percent of the IRS’ Taxpayer Service budget is allocated to the Wage and
Investment Division. The objective of
the audit was to determine whether this Division accurately
accounted for its estimated Taxpayer Service cost savings and program
efficiency initiatives for Fiscal Years 2006 and 2007 and achievements for
Fiscal Year 2006.
WHAT
TIGTA FOUND
To support decreases in funding for Fiscal Years 2006 and
2007, the Wage and Investment Division estimated it would achieve approximately
$122 million and $47 million in Taxpayer Service savings, respectively. For the most part, the methodologies for
calculating almost $23 million Taxpayer Service savings estimates for
Electronic Filing Initiatives and Improvement Projects were documented based on
records used to build the business cases and estimates. However, the savings estimates for over $146 million in Taxpayer Service Reengineering and
Taxpayer Service Program Efficiencies Initiatives were generally not supported
and could not be validated.
The Wage and Investment Division had not adequately
documented the methodologies used to calculate the savings. Source documentation had not been created or
maintained, or not all data provided were accurate or the most current
available, and some of the data were based on estimates and projections instead
of actual data currently available. In
addition, the Wage and Investment Division Strategy and Finance Office relied
on other Division offices and functions to provide the documentation.
The lack of validation happened for many reasons, including
the length and complexity of the budget process itself and not having a cost
accounting system that can adequately capture costs at the activity or program
level. In addition, the various
components of the savings were calculated by different Wage and Investment
Division offices and functions using different methods and rates. Finally, the data were not subjected to a
quality review process.
Most of the $122 million Taxpayer Service savings estimated for
Fiscal Year 2006 were not achieved or could not be validated. The financial records system showed
adjustments for the almost $110 million savings estimated and allocated to the
various Wage and Investment Division financial plans. Eventually, most of the funds were internally
reallocated because legislation prohibited the IRS from taking certain actions,
projects were cancelled or delayed, and savings did not materialize. The lack of sufficient management information
and financial systems that capture activity costs hinders the Wage and
Investment Division ability to determine whether it is meeting its performance
goals.
WHAT TIGTA RECOMMENDED
The Commissioner, Wage and Investment Division, should (1) develop
a thorough process for compiling the data used for the IRS’ budget requests to
help ensure the accuracy of the estimates and to facilitate a better
understanding of the impact of budget reductions on operations and (2) evaluate
the extent to which estimated savings are achieved as well as the impact on IRS
operations of savings that are not achieved, to assist in formulating future
budget submissions and allocations.
IRS management agreed with both of our
recommendations. They agreed that many
facets of the budget estimating process can be improved and plan to incorporate
our suggestions for standardization and quality control into the Wage and
Investment Division Strategy and Finance Office process.
READ THE
FULL REPORT
To view the report,
including the scope, methodology, and full IRS response, go to:
http://www.treas.gov/tigta/auditreports/2007reports/200740125fr.html.
Email
Address: Bonnie.Heald@tigta.treas.gov
Phone Number: 202-927-7037
Web Site:
http://www.tigta.gov