TREASURY INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR TAX
ADMINISTRATION
Office of Audit
THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE DEPLOYED
TWO OF ITS MOST IMPORTANT MODERNIZED SYSTEMS WITH KNOWN SECURITY
VULNERABILITIES
Issued on September 24, 2008
Highlights
Highlights of
Report Number: 2008-20-163 to the
Internal Revenue Service Commissioner for the Wage and Investment Division and the
Chief Information Officer.
IMPACT ON TAXPAYERS
The Customer Account Data
Engine (CADE) will
provide the foundation for managing all taxpayer accounts and will replace
existing tax processing systems. The Account Management Services (AMS) will provide faster and improved
access by employees to taxpayer account data.
Security weaknesses in controls over sensitive data protection, system
access, monitoring of system access, and disaster recovery have continued to
exist even though key phases of the CADE and the AMS have been deployed. As a result, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
is jeopardizing the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of an increasing
volume of tax information for millions of taxpayers as these systems are put
into operation.
WHY TIGTA DID THE AUDIT
This audit was initiated as part of TIGTA’s statutory
requirements to annually review the adequacy and security of IRS information technology. The objective was to determine whether
appropriate security controls were implemented in the CADE and the AMS systems.
WHAT
TIGTA FOUND
Our review of test documents provided by the IRS showed that
both the CADE and the AMS were deployed with known security vulnerabilities
relating to the protection of sensitive data, system access, monitoring of
system access, and disaster recovery.
These vulnerabilities increase the risks that 1) an unscrupulous person,
with little chance of detection, could gain unauthorized access to taxpayer
information the IRS processes, and 2) the systems could not be recovered
effectively and efficiently during an emergency.
TIGTA believes that key organizations did not consider the known security
vulnerabilities to be
significant, which affected vulnerability resolution and system deployment
decisions. Specifically, the CADE and
AMS project offices did not prevent and resolve known security vulnerabilities
before deployment of the systems. The Customer Service Executive Steering Committee, which has
final milestone exit approval, 1) did not provide sufficient oversight to
ensure that security controls were implemented, and 2) signed off
unconditionally on CADE milestones despite the existence of weaknesses
repeatedly reported to the Committee.
Finally, the Cybersecurity organization recommended–and the system
owners accepted–the risks associated with these vulnerabilities by accrediting
the systems. TIGTA disagreed with the
system owners’ acceptance of these security vulnerabilities.
WHAT TIGTA RECOMMENDED
TIGTA
recommended that 1) the
Customer Service Executive Steering Committee consider all security
vulnerabilities that affect the overall security of the CADE and the AMS before
approving unconditional milestone exits, 2) the CADE and AMS Project Managers
provide more emphasis on preventing and resolving security vulnerabilities
identified, and 3) the CADE and AMS system owners approve interim authorities
to operate when significant security control weaknesses exist in system
environments. In addition, the Associate
Chief Information Officer, Cybersecurity, should 4) recommend interim
authorities to operate when significant security vulnerabilities exist in
system environments and 5) continue efforts to improve the accuracy and
completeness of risk information in the security assessment reports.
In their response to the report, IRS
officials agreed with our recommendations.
The IRS plans to follow the governance process documented in the
Customer Service Executive Steering Committee charter and consider all security
vulnerabilities for delivery of project security and functionality; follow
existing Enterprise Life Cycle processes for identifying, confirming, and
resolving security vulnerabilities; strengthen its processes for documenting
all Executive Steering Committee meeting minutes; follow its policy to issue
interim authorities to operate when significant control weaknesses exist; and
modify the certification and accreditation process to include documented
concurrence when security weaknesses have been corrected.
The
related corrective actions for the recommendations are focused on continuing to
follow or strengthening existing processes.
TIGTA believes that the security vulnerabilities were not caused by
process deficiencies. Instead, IRS personnel
did not fulfill their responsibilities for correcting security vulnerabilities
before deployment.
READ THE
FULL REPORT
To view the report,
including the scope, methodology, and full IRS response, go to:
http://www.treas.gov/tigta/auditreports/2008reports/200820163fr.html.
Email Address: inquiries@tigta.treas.gov
Phone Number: 202-622-6500
Web Site:
http://www.tigta.gov