Treasury
Inspector General for Tax Administration
Office of Audit
AN APPROPRIATE METHODOLOGY HAS BEEN
DEVELOPED FOR CONDUCTING THE NATIONAL RESEARCH PROGRAM STUDY TO MEASURE THE
VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE OF INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAXPAYERS
Issued on June 17, 2009
Highlights
Highlights of
Report Number: 2009-30-086 to the
Internal Revenue Service Commissioner for the Small Business/Self-Employed Division
and Director, Office of Research, Analysis, and Statistics.
IMPACT ON TAXPAYERS
The Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) is conducting a multiyear National Research Program (NRP) study (hereafter
referred to as the NRP study or the study) to measure the voluntary compliance
of individual income taxpayers. IRS
management developed an appropriate methodology for conducting the study and
took proper steps to ensure that the study provides quality and accurate
results. Because the NRP study results
will be used to help identify tax returns that have a higher likelihood of
noncompliance, the IRS can direct resources to where they provide the most
value, which will reduce the burden on compliant taxpayers.
WHY TIGTA DID THE AUDIT
This audit was performed because the IRS recognized the need
for more current information about individual taxpayer compliance and initiated
a new Individual Reporting Compliance Study.
The objective of our review was to determine the adequacy of the
methodology for conducting the study. This
audit was conducted as part of the TIGTA Fiscal Year 2009 Annual Audit Plan under
the major management challenge of Tax Compliance Initiatives.
WHAT
TIGTA FOUND
TIGTA determined
that the methodology of the NRP study sampling plan was appropriate. Our review verified that the sample size was
sufficient to measure the statistical reliability of results, the related
calculations were accurate and consistent, and the formulas were
appropriate. In addition, the sampling
process was generally carried out as planned during the first year of the
study.
To ensure the
quality and accuracy of results, management instituted a multilayered quality
review process, procedures for manual and systemic checks for data accuracy,
and an effective process for training employees. While there are requirements for quality
reviews at the field office and Area Office levels, there are no requirements
for quality reviews to be conducted at the national level.
After NRP
study examination procedures had been established, management determined that
the quality review process would be improved by involving personnel at the
national level. As a result, national
level analysts conducted Program visitations the first year of the study and
will participate in reviews with each of the Area Office NRP study quality
review teams during the second year of the study. However, without continued national
involvement in the quality review process, the IRS’ ability to provide proper
oversight and ensure consistency and quality could be negatively affected.
WHAT TIGTA RECOMMENDED
TIGTA
recommended that the Director, Examination, Small Business/ Self‑Employed
Division, include a provision in the Internal Revenue Manual requiring Small Business/Self-Employed
Division Examination Headquarters and NRP staff to provide oversight of NRP reviews
conducted by Area Offices.
In
their response to the report, IRS officials agreed with the recommendation and plan
to update the Internal Revenue Manual for NRP Individual Income Tax Reporting Compliance
Studies to add a provision requiring Small Business/Self-Employed Division
Headquarters and NRP staff to provide oversight of NRP exam reviews.
READ THE
FULL REPORT
To view the report,
including the scope, methodology, and full IRS response, go to:
http://www.treas.gov/tigta/auditreports/2009reports/200930086fr.html.
Email Address: inquiries@tigta.treas.gov
Phone Number: 202-622-6500
Web Site:
http://www.tigta.gov