Treasury
Inspector General for Tax Administration
Office of Audit
POTENTIAL
OPPORTUNITIES EXIST TO ENHANCE THE FAVORABLE PRODUCTIVITY TRENDS FOR AUDITS
INITIATED BY THE UPDATED RETURN SELECTION FORMULAS
Issued on August 5, 2009
Highlights
Highlights of Report Number: 2009-30-105
to the Internal Revenue Service Commissioner for
the Small Business/Self-Employed Division.
IMPACT ON TAXPAYERS
Fewer examinations initiated by
the updated Discriminant Index Function (DIF) formulas are being closed with no
recommended tax changes, which indicates that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
is better focusing its examination resources on returns posing the greatest
compliance risk and not burdening compliant taxpayers with an examination. Small Business/Self-Employed (SB/SE) Division
statistics also indicate that taxpayers are agreeing with more of the
additional taxes recommended in examinations initiated by the updated DIF
formulas. This is important because the
additional taxes owed from agreed examinations are far more likely to be
collected than those that are assessed by default or disputed and appealed
through the IRS administrative processes or the courts.
WHY TIGTA DID THE AUDIT
The objectives of this review were
to determine the status of using National Research Program data to select
individual returns for examination in the SB/SE Division and the impact the
data are having on examination results.
The review was part of our risk-based audit coverage under the major
management challenge of Tax Compliance Initiatives.
WHAT
TIGTA FOUND
The
IRS considers the National Research Program very important, and the SB/SE
Division reflected this priority in the emphasis given to using the updated DIF
formulas developed from National Research Program data to select returns for
examination. The updated formulas were
first used to score individual tax returns in Processing Year 2006, and by the
end of Fiscal Year 2008 SB/SE Division
statistics show the number of DIF initiated examinations is increasing,
especially among Revenue Agents.
TIGTA found that while overall
examination productivity is trending favorably for DIF initiated examinations,
the results are mixed for those closed by Revenue Agents. In general, Revenue Agents conduct more complex
examinations than Tax Compliance Officers, such as those involving issues
related to business individuals and those of individuals with higher income
levels. Before the updated formulas were introduced, DIF initiated examinations
closed by Revenue Agents generated more
recommended additional taxes and lower no-change rates for most of the 5
previous periods analyzed.
Comparatively, Tax Compliance Officer results show higher recommended
additional taxes on a return and hourly basis and a lower no-change rate after
the updated DIF formulas were introduced.
The differences noted in the productivity trends between Revenue Agents
and Tax Compliance Officers suggest there may be opportunities to improve how
effectively returns are screened once delivered to Revenue Agent groups in the
field.
WHAT TIGTA RECOMMENDED
TIGTA recommended that the
Director, Examination, SB/SE Division, establish a process, at least on a test
basis, to evaluate the quality and appropriateness of the survey decisions made
by Revenue Agents and their managers on DIF selected returns so that corrective actions, if needed, can be identified and taken.
In their
response to the report, IRS officials agreed with our recommendation and plan
to conduct a review of surveyed DIF returns using a modified Income Tax Survey
After Assignment (Form 1900). The IRS
also noted that our recommendation will strengthen the SB/SE Division’s
understanding of the reasons DIF returns are surveyed.
READ THE FULL REPORT
To view the report, including the scope, methodology,
and full IRS response, go to:
http://www.treas.gov/tigta/auditreports/2009reports/200930105fr.html.
Email Address: inquiries@tigta.treas.gov
Phone Number: 202-622-6500
Web Site:
http://www.tigta.gov