Treasury
Inspector General for Tax Administration
Office of Audit
MODERNIZED E-FILE WILL ENHANCE
PROCESSING OF ELECTRONICALLY FILED INDIVIDUAL TAX RETURNS, BUT SYSTEM
DEVELOPMENT AND SECURITY NEED IMPROVEMENT
Issued on May 26, 2010
Highlights
Highlights of
Report Number: 2010-20-041 to the
Internal Revenue Service Chief Technology Officer.
IMPACT ON TAXPAYERS
The
Modernized e-File Project’s (MeF) goal is to replace
the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) current tax return filing technology with
a modernized, Internet-based electronic filing platform. This will allow more individual taxpayers to
take advantage of the benefits of electronic filing, while streamlining the
IRS’ filing processes and reducing the costs associated with paper tax
returns. The IRS’ management of the
Project’s risks, requirements, and security can be improved to ensure the
capabilities expected and approved to be deployed are appropriately
implemented.
WHY TIGTA DID THE AUDIT
This
review was part of our Fiscal Year 2010 Annual Audit Plan and addresses the
major management challenge of Modernization of the IRS. The overall objective of this review was to
determine whether the MeF Project Release 6.1 development activities provided
the capability to electronically receive, process, and secure U.S. Individual
Income Tax Returns (Form 1040), delivering the intended benefits to the IRS and
taxpayers.
WHAT
TIGTA FOUND
On February
17, 2010, the IRS deployed MeF Release 6.1 and began processing electronically
filed individual income tax forms. The
MeF Release 6.1 development included a plan to limit the volume of forms for
Calendar Year 2010 so the IRS and tax form transmitters have an opportunity to
observe system behavior.
Although System
Integration Test Results indicated all application requirements were tested and
passed, supporting test documents showed that many of the requirements were not
tested and many more failed the tests and no indication was provided to show
the defects were corrected. During the
first 3 weeks of operation, the MeF system rejected 23 percent of the individual
income tax returns filed.
Additionally, TIGTA found that improvements to guidance in
managing requirements and risks could have enhanced the project development
schedule. The Project Team reported
capacity testing as a risk to the project schedule, and may have identified the
components of this earlier in the project development design phase by reviewing
prior release development and deployment experiences – Lessons Learned Reports.
Further, controls were not adequate to manage all of the MeF
system security risks, issues, and action items. Information provided by the IRS about the
status of the previously reported security vulnerabilities showed that in
December 2009, 10 of the 13 vulnerabilities were resolved. However, the January 2010 Security Test and
Evaluation reported that only 2 of the 13 vulnerabilities were resolved.
WHAT TIGTA RECOMMENDED
TIGTA
recommended the Chief Technology Officer ensure that project releases are
deployed only after all system requirements are tested and met and that test
results are verified to ensure their completeness and accuracy. Further, project development guidance should
be modified to require consideration of prior Lessons Learned Reports and the
Risk Identification Procedure as input to Project Initiation and Phase Kickoff
Meeting Procedure.
To
adequately control and resolve all MeF system security issues, the Chief
Technology Officer should ensure the Cybersecurity organization completes
implementation of the process to ensure that system owners comply with IRS
policy to enter and track all system security weaknesses in IRS control
systems.
In its
response to the report, the IRS stated it plans to update project development guidance and that
it completed the process to control system security weaknesses as of March 25,
2010. The IRS disagreed with the
recommendation about release deployment only after testing showed requirements
were met, citing milestone readiness reviews and the Executive Steering
Committee as controls. With the
significant number of failed tests and the resulting problems in rejected
individual income tax returns filed, TIGTA questions whether the Executive
Steering Committee had sufficient and timely information to make an informed
risk-based decision for deploying MeF Release 6.1.
READ THE
FULL REPORT
To view the report, including the scope, methodology, and full IRS response, go to: http://www.treas.gov/tigta/auditreports/2010reports/201020041fr.html.
Email Address: inquiries@tigta.treas.gov
Phone Number: 202-622-6500
Web Site:
http://www.tigta.gov