Treasury
Inspector General for Tax Administration
Office of Audit
FISCAL YEAR 2010 REVIEW OF COMPLIANCE
WITH LEGAL GUIDELINES WHEN CONDUCTING SEIZURES OF TAXPAYERS’ PROPERTY
Issued on May 7, 2010
Highlights
Highlights of
Report Number: 2010-30-049 to the
Internal Revenue Service Commissioner for
the Small Business/Self-Employed Division.
IMPACT ON TAXPAYERS
To
ensure taxpayers’ rights are protected, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 amended
the seizure provisions in Internal
Revenue Code Sections 6330 through 6344
(1994 & Supp. IV 1998). The
IRS did not always comply with these statutory requirements. Although we did not identify instances in
which taxpayers were adversely affected, noncompliance with Internal
Revenue Code requirements could result
in abuses of taxpayers’ rights.
WHY TIGTA DID THE AUDIT
TIGTA is required under Internal Revenue Code Section 7803(d)(1)(A)(iv)
(Supp. IV 1998) to annually evaluate the IRS’ compliance with the legal seizure
provisions to ensure that taxpayers’ rights were not violated while seizures
were being conducted.
WHAT
TIGTA FOUND
The collection of unpaid tax by
the IRS generally begins with letters to the taxpayer followed by telephone
calls and personal contacts by an IRS employee.
The employees who make personal contact are referred to as revenue
officers. They consider the taxpayer’s
ability to pay the tax and discuss alternatives, such as an installment
agreement or an offer in compromise. If
these actions have been taken and the taxpayer has not fully paid the tax due,
the revenue officer has the authority to take the taxpayer’s funds or property
for the payment of tax. Taking a
taxpayer’s property for unpaid tax is commonly referred to as a “seizure.”
TIGTA reviewed a random sample of 50 of the 578 seizures conducted from
July 1, 2008, through June 30, 2009, to determine whether the IRS is
complying with legal and internal guidelines when conducting seizures. The review included a total of 58 guidelines
for each seizure. TIGTA determined that in the
majority of seizures, the IRS followed all guidelines applicable to the
respective case. However, in 17 seizures, there were 22 instances in which the
IRS did not comply with a particular Internal Revenue Code requirement. While TIGTA did not identify any instances in
which the taxpayers were adversely affected, not following legal and internal
guidelines could result in abuses of taxpayers’ rights.
After the seizure of property, the IRS is required to
provide the taxpayer a Notice of Seizure (Form 2433) that specifies the
liability for which the seizure was made and an accounting of the property
seized. The liability should be the
total amount due for all accruals and the tax modules listed on the Levy (Form
668-B). In seven cases, the Notice of
Seizure (Form 2433) provided to the taxpayer did not show the correct liability.
Money
realized from the seizure of property is required to be applied first to
expenses of the seizure and sale, second against any unpaid tax imposed by IRS
law against the property seized, and finally against the liability for which
the seizure was made. We identified
seven instances in which expenses and proceeds were not properly applied to the
taxpayer’s account.
WHAT TIGTA RECOMMENDED
TIGTA
identified similar issues in last year’s report and the IRS has taken
corrective action. However, the seizures
in this year’s review were conducted prior to implementation of these actions. Therefore, TIGTA is not making any new
recommendations. Although we made no
recommendations in this report, we did provide IRS officials an opportunity to
review the draft report. IRS management
did not provide us with any report comments.
READ THE
FULL REPORT
To view the report,
including the scope and methodology, go to:
http://www.treas.gov/tigta/auditreports/2010reports/201030049fr.html.
Email Address: inquiries@tigta.treas.gov
Phone Number: 202-622-6500
Web Site:
http://www.tigta.gov