Surveys of Taxpayers With
Tax Account Issues Indicate They Are Satisfied With the Service They Received
at Taxpayer Assistance Centers
August 17, 2010
Reference Number: 2010-40-100
This report has cleared the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration disclosure review process and information determined to be restricted from public release has been redacted from this document.
Phone Number |
202-622-6500
Email Address | inquiries@tigta.treas.gov
Web Site |
http://www.tigta.gov
HIGHLIGHTS
Surveys of
Taxpayers With Tax Account Issues Indicate They Are Satisfied With the Service
They Received at Taxpayer Assistance Centers
Highlights
Final
Report issued on August 17, 2010
Highlights of Reference Number: 2010-40-100 to the Internal Revenue Service
Commissioner for the Wage and Investment Division.
IMPACT ON TAXPAYERS
One
of the primary goals of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is to improve
customer service to make voluntary compliance easier. One method the IRS uses to provide customer
service and taxpayer assistance is by providing local IRS walk-in offices,
called Taxpayer Assistance Centers, which allow taxpayers to obtain assistance
with tax matters.
WHY TIGTA DID THE AUDIT
Taxpayer
account services are a significant part of the Taxpayer Assistance Center
Program. This audit evaluated the
customer service IRS employees provided to taxpayers who visited Taxpayer
Assistance Centers for tax account information.
WHAT
TIGTA FOUND
Taxpayers who visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers with
tax account issues were satisfied with the overall customer service they
received during their visits. They
generally believed they received prompt service and that assistors who helped
them were courteous, listened to their concerns, and had the knowledge to
assist them properly.
A
small percentage of taxpayers were dissatisfied. These taxpayers’ experiences differed from
the average
Still,
most taxpayers who visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers for tax account issues
have little or no desire to contact the IRS using other methods, such as using
a toll-free telephone service or secure Internet web sites.
Approximately 1 million
taxpayers each year visit Taxpayer Assistance Centers to make payments despite
there being more convenient methods. The
other methods are also less expensive for the IRS because the IRS estimates
that it costs approximately $29 per
Taxpayers who visit Taxpayer
Assistance Centers for tax account issues have some common attributes. Typically, they are:
·
Over the age of 50.
·
Have a lower than
average income.
·
Less likely to file
electronically or use a paid preparer.
WHAT TIGTA RECOMMENDED
The Commissioner, Wage
and Investment Division, should identify reasons certain taxpayers prefer to
make payments at Taxpayer Assistance Centers instead of using more convenient
methods and take appropriate actions in an attempt to reduce the number of
taxpayers who visit Taxpayer Assistance Centers to make payments.
The IRS agreed with the
recommendation and plans to conduct a study to determine why taxpayers prefer
to make payments at Taxpayer Assistance Centers instead of using alternative
methods. Based on the results of the
study, the IRS plans to examine opportunities to influence the behavior of
taxpayers and determine the feasibility of attempting to reduce the number of
taxpayers who visit Taxpayer Assistance Centers to make payments.
August 17, 2010
MEMORANDUM FOR COMMISSIONER, WAGE AND INVESTMENT DIVISION
FROM: Michael R. Phillips /s/ Michael R. Phillips
Deputy Inspector General for Audit
SUBJECT: Final Audit Report – Surveys of Taxpayers With Tax Account Issues Indicate They Are Satisfied With the Service They Received at Taxpayer Assistance Centers (Audit # 201040025)
This report presents the results of our review to evaluate the customer service Internal Revenue Service employees provided to taxpayers who visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers for account information. This audit was included in our 2010 Annual Audit Plan and addresses the major management challenge of Providing Quality Taxpayer Service Operations.
Management’s complete response to the draft report is included
in Appendix VII.
Copies of this report are also being sent to
the Internal Revenue Service managers affected by the report recommendation. Please contact me at (202) 622-6510 if you
have questions or Michael E. McKenney, Assistant Inspector General for Audit
(Returns Processing and Account Services), at (202) 622-5916.
Taxpayers Who Visit
Taxpayer Assistance Centers for Tax Account Issues Have Some Common Attributes
Appendices
Appendix
I – Detailed Objective, Scope, and Methodology
Appendix
II – Major Contributors to This Report
Appendix
III – Report Distribution List
Appendix IV
– Cover Letter Sent to Taxpayers With the Questionnaire
Appendix
V – Questionnaire Sent to Taxpayers
Appendix
VII – Management’s Response to the Draft Report
Abbreviations
|
CQRS |
Centralized Quality Review System |
|
IRS |
Internal Revenue Service |
|
TIGTA |
Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration |
One of the primary goals of the Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) is to improve customer service to make voluntary compliance easier. One method the IRS uses to provide customer
service and taxpayer assistance is by providing local IRS walk-in offices,
called Taxpayer Assistance Centers, which allow taxpayers to obtain assistance
with tax matters.
The IRS Field Assistance Office[1]
has overall responsibility for 401 Taxpayer Assistance Centers in
5 geographical areas throughout the
Figure 1:
(in millions)
|
Contacts/Product Lines |
Fiscal
Year |
Fiscal
Year |
Fiscal
Year |
Fiscal
Year 2010[2] |
|
Accounts Contacts |
3.1 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.5 |
|
Forms Contacts |
1.3 |
1.0 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
|
Other Contacts[3] |
1.4 |
1.5 |
1.5 |
1.4 |
|
Tax Law Contacts |
0.8 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
|
Tax Returns Prepared |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
|
Totals |
7.1 |
6.9 |
6.2 |
6.3 |
Source: IRS
management information reports.
The
Field Assistance Office’s mission is to enhance
the taxpayer experience by providing quality face-to-face assistance and
facilitate self-assisted services that resolve tax issues and educate the
taxpaying public. The Field
Assistance Office currently uses the IRS’ Centralized Quality Review System
(CQRS) to gauge its progress in meeting its goals and to measure quality. The Taxpayer Assistance Centers record
interactions between taxpayers and assistors (with taxpayers’ permission) for
quality assurance purposes using an automated Contact Recording system that records the
audio portion of a customer contact and synchronizes it with an employee’s
computer screen activity.
Quality reviewers review statistically valid samples of contacts to objectively evaluate customer service, analyze trends, identify opportunities for improvement, and implement quality improvement measures. The IRS believes the results from the reviews give statistically valid information—a true picture of current quality levels.
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) auditors conducted a customer service survey of taxpayers
We identified 2,038
taxpayers who visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers from August 2009 to April
2010 with a tax account issue. Of those,
we sent survey questionnaires to 1,543 and received 345 responses (22.3 percent
response rate).
We designed
the survey to evaluate the level of customer service taxpayers received when
they visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers in an attempt to resolve their tax
account issues. Of the
345 taxpayers who responded to our survey, 322 stated that they had
recently visited a
The survey
included taxpayers who the IRS selected for its CQRS quality reviews. We identified the taxpayers using the CQRS
Document Collection Instrument and used the IRS’ addresses and telephone
numbers of record to contact the taxpayers.
See Appendices IV and V for a copy of the cover letter and questionnaire
sent to taxpayers. See Appendix VI for
the results of the survey.
This review was performed at the Field Assistance Office at
the Wage and Investment Division Headquarters in
Taxpayers Who Visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers With Tax Account Issues Were Satisfied With the Overall Customer Service They Received
Taxpayers who visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers with tax account issues were satisfied with the overall customer service they received during their visits. They generally believed they received prompt service and that assistors who helped them were courteous, listened to their concerns, and had the knowledge to assist them properly.
Figure 2: Overall Satisfaction[4]
Statement: Overall, I was satisfied with the customer
service I received from the IRS during my visit to the IRS walk-in office. (316 Responses)[5]
Figure 2 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 2, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Figure 2 shows how taxpayers who visited a
In addition, as shown in Figure 3, 278 (89 percent) of 313 respondents
stated they would visit the same
Figure 3:
Taxpayers Would Return to the Same
Statement: If I have a similar issue in the future, I will visit the same IRS walk-in office again. (313 Responses)[8]
Figure 3 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 3, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
IRS surveys of taxpayers who visited a
Respondents
believed they received prompt service and were generally satisfied with the
quality of service visits
Overall, taxpayers responding to our survey were satisfied with the amount of time they spent in the Taxpayer Assistance Centers, including the amount of time they spent waiting for service (wait time) and the amount of time they spent discussing their issue with an assistor (service time).
Respondents believed they experienced reasonable wait times.
Of 313 taxpayers responding to the survey question regarding wait time,[10] 262 taxpayers (84 percent) believed their wait time was reasonable, including 203 respondents (65 percent) who strongly believed their wait time was reasonable. As shown in Figure 4, only 42 respondents (13 percent) believed their wait time was not reasonable.
Figure 4: Reasonable Wait Time
Statement: The amount of time I waited in the IRS walk-in
office before I received assistance with my tax account issue was reasonable.
(313 Responses)[11]
Figure 4 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 4, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Respondents believed they experienced reasonable service times.
Taxpayers who responded to our survey also believed assistors spent an appropriate amount of time with them. Of 312 respondents to the question regarding service time,[12] 285 (91 percent) stated the IRS employee who assisted them with their tax account issue(s) spent an appropriate amount of time with them (neither too short nor too long).
As shown in Figure 5, 244 respondents (78 percent) strongly agreed the assistors spent an appropriate amount of time with them, and only 19 respondents (6 percent) disagreed.
Figure 5: Appropriate Time With Assistor
Statement: The IRS employee who assisted me with my tax
account issue spent an appropriate amount of time with me (neither too short
nor too long). (312 Responses)[13]
Figure 5 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 5, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
IRS surveys of taxpayers who visited a
In addition, taxpayers were also satisfied with the ease with which they found the IRS walk-in offices, the ease with which they were able to determine what they needed to do to receive assistance once they arrived, and the atmosphere in the offices that provided a private contact with an IRS assistor. See Appendix VI for detailed results.
Respondents
believed
Respondents were very satisfied with the quality of service
they received from the
Figure 6: Assistors’ Quality of Service
|
The IRS
employee who assisted me with my tax account issue … |
Strongly Agree |
Somewhat Agree |
Neither Agree or Disagree |
Somewhat Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
|
… showed a genuine
concern for me and my issue when trying to assist me. (Question 13) |
233 |
42 |
6 |
8 |
22 |
|
… had adequate
knowledge to assist me with my issue.
(Question 14) |
236 |
39 |
13 |
6 |
20 |
|
… spent an
appropriate amount of time with me (neither too short nor too long). (Question 15) |
244 |
41 |
8 |
10 |
9 |
Source: TIGTA survey results.
These results are comparable to the results of similar questions on the IRS Customer Satisfaction Survey. For the three questions above, our respondents rated their experiences, on average, at 4.47 (Question 13), 4.48 (Question 14), and 4.61 (Question 15), whereas the IRS results showed a customer rating of 4.73 for courtesy and professionalism and 4.72 for knowledge.
In addition to the survey, we reviewed contact recordings for 25 contacts to determine if our assessment of the contact was similar to the respondents’ assessments. Our review verified that assistors were concerned with taxpayer issues, had the knowledge to assist taxpayers, and spent an appropriate amount of time with them.
Respondents who were not satisfied with the customer service they received were in the Taxpayer Assistance Centers longer and traveled farther to get there
While most survey respondents were satisfied with the customer service they received, a small percentage of them were dissatisfied. Respondents who were not satisfied with the customer service they received at Taxpayer Assistance Centers reported they:
Our survey did not allow us to identify a cause for this trend, nor did we identify any commonalities in these visits other than those subsequently discussed.
The amount of time a respondent had to wait to receive
assistance appears to be a factor in determining his or her overall
satisfaction with the
Figure 7: Average Wait Time for Respondents by Level of Satisfaction[14]
Statement:
Overall, I was satisfied with the customer service I received from the
IRS
during my visit to the IRS walk-in office. (254
Responses)
Figure 7 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 7, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Respondents also reported that they spent more time with assistors when they tried to resolve their tax issue. The average taxpayer reported spending approximately 18 minutes with an assistor when trying to resolve his or her tax account issue; however, respondents who were dissatisfied reported they spent, on average, more than 32 minutes with assistors. See Figure 8 for the average reported time respondents spent with assistors by level of satisfaction.
Figure 8: Average
Time Respondents Spent With Assistors
by Level of Satisfaction[15]
Statement: Overall, I was satisfied with the customer
service I received from the IRS
during my visit to the IRS walk-in office. (251
Responses)
Figure 8 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 8, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
In addition, respondents who were
dissatisfied with the customer service they received may have traveled farther
than the average respondent did. The
average distance to a
Figure 9: Average Distance for Respondents by Level of Satisfaction[16]
Statement: Overall, I was satisfied with the customer
service I received from the IRS
during my visit to the IRS walk-in office. (249 Responses)
Figure 9 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 9, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
In addition, more than 60 percent of taxpayers who responded that they were dissatisfied with the customer service they received did not believe assistors were genuinely concerned with their issue and did not have the knowledge to assist them.
Respondents
who visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers do not wish to use alternative methods to
resolve their tax account issues
According to the 2008 and 2009 IRS Oversight Board Reports, more
taxpayers consider a toll-free telephone number or secure Internet site more
important in helping them resolve their tax issues than Taxpayer Assistance
Centers. However, the results of our
survey show that taxpayers who visit Taxpayer Assistance Centers for tax account
issues have little or no desire to contact the IRS using other methods.
A total of 143 respondents stated that their
Figure 10: Taxpayer Service Preferences[17]
|
Question |
Strongly Agree |
Somewhat Agree |
Neither Agree or Disagree |
Somewhat Disagree |
Strongly Disagree |
|
Before visiting the
IRS walk-in office, I was aware of other services the IRS provides (e.g.: telephone or Internet services) that could
help me resolve my tax issues. |
183 |
56 |
25 |
12 |
28 |
|
Compared to visiting
the IRS walk-in office, I would rather, if possible, try to resolve my tax
account issues via a toll-free telephone call. |
55 |
33 |
47 |
33 |
139 |
|
Compared to visiting
the IRS walk-in office, I would rather, if possible, try to resolve my tax
account issues via a secure Internet site. |
42 |
40 |
42 |
36 |
146 |
Source: TIGTA survey results.
As shown in Figure 10, despite generally being aware of other options, more
than 56 percent of respondents indicated they would prefer not to try to solve
their tax account issues via a toll-free telephone call and 59 percent
indicated they would prefer not to try to solve their tax account issues via a
secure Internet site. Instead, they
would rather visit the
The Internal Revenue Service Could Benefit From Determining Why Taxpayers Visit Taxpayer Assistance Centers to Make Payments
Approximately 30 percent of taxpayers who responded to the survey visited
Taxpayer Assistance Centers to make payments.
The IRS reports that approximately 1 million taxpayers each year visit
the Taxpayer Assistance Centers to make payments. Yet the IRS provides taxpayers with more
convenient methods to make payments, such as through its Electronic Federal Tax
Payment System,[18] by credit card, or by mailing
payments to the IRS. Using one of these
methods may be more convenient for taxpayers, but may also be less expensive
for both the taxpayer and the IRS. The
IRS estimates that it costs approximately $29 per
There are various reasons why taxpayers choose to make payments at a
In November 2009, the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel issued a report[20] on how to improve the payment process in the Taxpayer Assistance Centers.[21] The report made a number of recommendations, including changing forms and adding drop boxes. The report did not address the reasons taxpayers visit Taxpayer Assistance Centers to make payments.
The IRS could benefit from identifying the reasons a large number of taxpayers regularly visit Taxpayer Assistance Centers to make payments and alternative ways to educate and encourage them to use payment methods other than in-person delivery. This would reduce repeat traffic, wait time, and payment processing costs and time. It would also give assistors additional time to assist taxpayers with more complex issues.
Recommendation
Recommendation 1: The Commissioner,
Wage and Investment Division, should identify reasons certain taxpayers prefer
to make payments at Taxpayer Assistance Centers instead of using more
convenient methods and take appropriate actions in an attempt to reduce the
number of taxpayers who visit Taxpayer Assistance Centers to make payments.
Management’s Response: The IRS agreed with the recommendation and
will conduct a study to determine why taxpayers prefer to make payments at
Taxpayer Assistance Centers instead of using alternative methods. Based on the results of the study, the IRS
will examine opportunities to influence the behavior of taxpayers and determine
the feasibility of attempting to reduce the number of taxpayers who visit Taxpayer
Assistance Centers to make payments.
Taxpayers Who Visit Taxpayer Assistance Centers for Tax Account Issues Have Some Common Attributes
The typical taxpayer who visits a
Typically, taxpayers who visit Taxpayer Assistance Centers for account
issues do so to make a payment, get general information about their account, or
get information regarding notices received.
They travel anywhere from 0 to 135 miles (averaging 15 miles) to get to the
Taxpayer Assistance Centers and have an average wait time of 28 minutes before
receiving assistance.
Most taxpayers visiting
Taxpayer Assistance Centers for tax account issues are over the age of 50.
Taxpayers who visit Taxpayer Assistance Centers for tax account issues are
most likely to be at least 50 years old, and more than 45 percent of all taxpayers
who visit Taxpayer Assistance Centers with a tax account issue fall between the
ages of 50 and 69. Figure 11 shows the ages
of respondents who visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers for tax account issues.
Figure 11: Ages
of Taxpayers Who Visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers
for Tax Account Issues and Their Customer Service Level
Figure 11 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 11, please go to the Adobe PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.[23]
Survey responses indicate that taxpayers age of 50 or older who visited
Taxpayer Assistance Centers for tax account issues were typically aware of
alternative methods with which they may be able to handle their tax account
issues, but prefer to handle them at Taxpayer Assistance Centers. In general, these taxpayers were just as
satisfied with the service they received at Taxpayer Assistance Centers as younger
taxpayers. In fact, no particular age
group showed a significant difference in satisfaction levels.
Taxpayers visiting Taxpayer
Assistance Centers for tax account issues typically have a lower income than
the national median income.
The median total income of a respondent was approximately $34,100. The national median household income in the
Figure 12: Wages
of Taxpayers Who Visited Taxpayer Assistance
Centers for Tax Account Issues and Their Customer Service Level
Figure 12 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 12, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Despite the vast difference in household income for taxpayers who visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers with a tax account issue, there was little difference in how customer service at the Taxpayer Assistance Centers was perceived. Respondents of all income levels were satisfied with the customer service they received.
Similarly, taxpayers’ filing statuses did not affect their customer satisfaction. There were no significant differences in taxpayers’ satisfaction with the Taxpayer Assistance Centers based on filing status. Figure 13 shows the filing status of taxpayers who visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers for tax account issues.
Figure 13: Filing
Status of Taxpayers Who Visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers
for Tax Account Issues and Their Customer Service Level
Figure 13 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 13, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Our survey also determined taxpayers who visit Taxpayer
Assistance Centers with tax account issues were less likely to file electronic
returns or use a paid preparer. They are
more inclined to file a paper return (54 percent) than the national average (33
percent) and were more inclined to prepare the return without using a paid
preparer (55 percent) than the national average (40 percent). Figures 14 and 15 show the percentage of respondents
who visited a
Figure 14: Electronic
and Paper Filing by Taxpayers Who Visit
Taxpayer Assistance Centers for Tax Account Issues
Figure 14 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 14, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Figure 15: Use of
Paid Preparers by Taxpayers Who Visit
Taxpayer Assistance Centers for Tax Account Issues
Figure 15 was removed due to its size. To see Figure 15, please go to the Adobe PDF
version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Appendix I
Detailed Objective, Scope, and Methodology
Our overall objective was to evaluate the
customer service IRS employees provided to taxpayers who visited Taxpayer
Assistance Centers for account information.
To accomplish this objective, we:
I. Identified the trends associated with customer satisfaction levels and customer needs.
A. Reviewed taxpayer surveys and results completed by the external stakeholders.
B. Reviewed the Field Assistance Office[25] customer satisfaction survey results.
C. Evaluated how the Field Assistance Office has used survey results to improve the quality of service provided in the centers.
II. Evaluated the satisfaction of customers who visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers by conducting a survey of taxpayers during the period January through April 2010.
A. Identified 2,038 taxpayers who visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers from August 2009 to April 2010 with a tax account issue. We sent survey questionnaires to the 1,543 with a valid address on the Individual Master File.[26] We obtained 345 survey responses. We identified the taxpayers by completing the following:
1.
Identified
taxpayers who visited a
2.
On
a periodic basis from January 29 to April 2, 2010, identified taxpayers who
visited a
3. For taxpayers identified in II.A.1. and II.A.2., researched IRS’ Individual Master File Return Transaction File[27] and identified 1,543 taxpayers’ entity information, including name, address, and demographic information (e.g., income, filing status).
4. Mailed 1,543 cover letters and surveys to taxpayers. Taxpayers responded to the survey via Internet (19 taxpayers), mail (214 taxpayers), or telephone (112 taxpayers).
5. Obtained all available contact recordings from February 24 to April 9, 2010.
6. For 25 contacts in which the taxpayer responded to our survey, we reviewed contact recordings from II.A.5. and determined if taxpayer responses are representative of actual events.
B.
Evaluated taxpayers’ experiences when visiting a
1. Quantified the results after the completion of the 345 surveys.
2. Stratified and compared data by various categories.
3. Obtained demographic information for respondents from the Individual Master File Return Transaction File and stratified results by age, filing status, income level, and geographical areas.
Internal controls methodology
Internal controls relate to management’s
plans, methods, and procedures used to meet their mission, goals, and
objectives. Internal controls include
the processes and procedures for planning, organizing, directing, and
controlling program operations. They
include the systems for measuring, reporting, and monitoring program
performance. This audit did not include
reviewing any IRS processes or procedures, but focused on taxpayers. We only considered internal controls if
taxpayers’ responses to surveys identified any potential concerns or fraudulent
activities; they did not.
Appendix II
Major Contributors to This Report
Michael
E. McKenney, Assistant Inspector General for Audit (Returns Processing and
Account Services)
Augusta
R. Cook, Director
Wilma
Figueroa, Audit Manager
Frank
Jones, Audit Manager
Kenneth
Carlson, Lead Auditor
Tanya
Adams, Senior Auditor
Roberta
Fuller, Senior Auditor
Jerome
Antoine, Auditor
Jack
Forbus, Auditor
Andrea
Hayes, Auditor
Nelva
Usher, Auditor
Geraldine
Vaughn, Auditor
Appendix III
Commissioner C
Office of the Commissioner – Attn: Chief of Staff C
Deputy Commissioner for Operations Support OS
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement SE
Deputy Chief Information Officer for Strategy/Modernization OS:CTO
Deputy
Commissioner, Wage and Investment Division
SE:W
Director, Compliance, Wage and Investment Division SE:W:CP
Director, Customer Assistance, Relationships, and Education, Wage and Investment Division SE:W:CAR
Chief,
Program Evaluation and Improvement, Wage and Investment Division SE:W:S:PRA:
Chief Counsel CC
National Taxpayer Advocate TA
Director, Office of Legislative Affairs CL:LA
Director, Office of Program Evaluation and Risk Analysis RAS:O
Office of Internal Control OS:CFO:CPIC:IC
Audit
Liaison: Chief, Program Evaluation and
Improvement, Wage and Investment Division
SE:W:S:PRA:
Appendix IV
Cover Letter Sent to Taxpayers With the Questionnaire
The picture of the Cover Letter was removed due to its
size. To see the Cover Letter, please go
to the Adobe PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Appendix V
Questionnaire Sent to Taxpayers
The picture of the Questionnaire was removed due to
its size. To see the Questionnaire,
please go to the Adobe PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Appendix VI
We obtained the following selected results from our survey of taxpayers who visited Taxpayer Assistance Centers with tax account issues.[28]
The charts in this Appendix are designed to show positive and negative responses to each question, with positive responses shown to the right of the center line and negative or neutral responses shown to the left of the center line.
The score for each question and the total number of taxpayers who responded to the question (N) is to the right of the question. For example, for question 8, taxpayers scored the IRS’ customer service for this category as 4.25 and 317 taxpayers responded to the question.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Questions 8 through 21 gave taxpayers the following options when presented with statements regarding the IRS’ customer service.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
General Statements
Questions 8 through 12 asked
taxpayers to rate general customer service issues they encountered during their
visit to a
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Assistors
Questions 13, 14, and 15 asked taxpayers to rate their
satisfaction with the courtesy, knowledge, and professionalism of
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Survey Cards
Question 16 asked taxpayers to rate how easy it was to return Customer Service Survey cards given to them at the Taxpayer Assistance Centers.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Other Services Provided by the Internal Revenue Service
Questions 17, 18, and 19 asked taxpayers to rate their knowledge of other IRS services and their likelihood to use them in the future.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Overall Satisfaction With Customer Service
Questions 20 and 21 asked taxpayers to rate their overall
satisfaction with the customer service they received when visiting a
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
The picture was removed due to its size. To see the picture, please go to the Adobe
PDF version of the report on the TIGTA Public Web Page.
Appendix VII
Management’s Response to the Draft Report
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
COMMISSIONER
WAGE AND
INVESTMENT DIVISION
JULY 28, 2010
MEMORANDUM FOR MICHAEL R. PHILLIPS
DEPUTY
INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR AUDIT
FROM: for Richard Byrd Jr. /s/ Peggy Bogadi
Commissioner, Wage and Investment Division
SUBJECT” Draft
Audit Report - Surveys of Taxpayers With Tax Account Issues Indicate They Are
Satisfied With the Service They Received at Taxpayer Assistance Centers (Audit
# 201040025)
We have reviewed the subject draft report and
agree with your findings and recommendation. Your report underscores the strong
commitment of our employees in the Taxpayer Assistance Centers (TACs) to
provide professional and courteous service to over six million taxpayers each
year. As your report indicates, most taxpayers are satisfied with the service
that they receive in the TACs, which is similar to the results of the Customer
Satisfaction Survey.
Your report references a large number of
taxpayers that visit TACs for account issues and to make payments. However, as
stated in your report, taxpayers were typically aware of alternative methods in
which they could handle their tax account issues, but prefer to handle payments
at the TACs. Converting the behavior of these taxpayers will be a significant
challenge.
Our specific comments to your recommendation
are attached. If you have any questions, please contact me, or a member of your
staff may contact Leslye Baronich, Director, Field Assistance, Wage and
Investment Division, at (404) 338-7141.
Attachment
Attachment
RECOMMENDATION
1
The Commissioner, Wage and Investment Division,
should identify reasons certain taxpayers prefer to make payments at Taxpayer
Assistance Centers instead of using more convenient methods and take appropriate
actions in an attempt to reduce the number of taxpayers who visit Taxpayer
Assistance Centers to make payments.
CORRECTIVE
ACTION
We agree with this recommendation. A study
will be conducted by the Research Office in the Wage and Investment Division to
determine why taxpayers prefer to make payments at the Taxpayer Assistance
Centers (TACs) instead of using alternative methods available. Based on the
results of the study, Field Assistance will examine opportunities to impact the
behavior of taxpayers and determine the feasibility of attempting to reduce the
number of taxpayers that visit TACs to make payments.
IMPLEMENTATION
DATE
The study results are expected to be
completed by December 15, 2011.
RESPONSIBLE
OFFICIAL
Director, Field Assistance, Wage and
Investment Division
CORRECTIVE
ACTION MONITORING PLAN
The IRS will monitor this corrective action as part of our internal management
[1] The Field Assistance Office is within the Wage and Investment Division Customer Assistance, Relationships, and Education function.
[2] Fiscal Year 2010 contacts are Field Assistance Office’s projections.
[3]
Examples of “Other Contacts” include assisting
taxpayers with the U.S. Departing Alien Income Tax Statement
(Form 2063), date stamping tax returns brought in by taxpayers, and
helping taxpayers with general information such as addresses and directions to
other IRS offices or other Federal Government agencies.
[4] Due to rounding, the percentages in the legend of this and other figures may not total 100 percent.
[5] For 316 responses, at a 95 percent confidence level, the precision for a 50 percent error rate would be 5.5 percent. The actual precision for individual response categories would be lower.
[6] These results come from Question 21 of the questionnaire. See Appendix VI for details.
[7] Not all respondents answered all survey questions.
[8] For 313 responses, at a 95 percent confidence level, the precision for a 50 percent error rate would be 5.5 percent. The actual precision for individual response categories would be lower.
[9] Common
reasons a taxpayer may visit an
[10] These results are from Question 11 of the questionnaire. See Appendix VI for details.
[11] For 313 responses, at a 95 percent confidence level, the precision for a 50 percent error rate would be 5.5 percent. The actual precision for individual response categories would be lower.
[12] These results come from Question 15 of the questionnaire. See Appendix VI for details.
[13] For 312 responses, at a 95 percent confidence level, the precision for a 50 percent error rate would be 5.5 percent. The actual precision for individual response categories would be lower.
[14] Testing showed statistical significance at the .01 level of significance (p-value = .0009).
[15] Testing showed statistical significance at the .05 level of significance (p-value = .0208).
[16] Testing showed statistical significance at the .10 level of significance (p-value = .0995).
[17] Responses that indicated the taxpayer did not remember or did not feel the question was applicable to their visit are not included in this table.
[18] The Electronic Federal Tax Payment System is a tax payment system provided free by the Department of the Treasury. Businesses and individuals can pay all their Federal taxes using the Electronic Federal Tax Payment System. Both businesses and individuals can schedule payments in advance.
[19] The 2007 Taxpayer Assistance Blueprint – Phase 2 (dated April 2007).
[20]
The
[21] The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel was established in October 2002 under the Federal Advisory Committee Act as a way of improving IRS responsiveness to taxpayers needs. The panel offers a unique opportunity for citizens to participate in the improvement of both the American tax administration system and the organization of the IRS.
[22] The average income is $50,383.
[23] The Individual Return Transaction File contains data transcribed from U.S. Individual Income Tax Returns (Forms 1040, 1040A, and 1040EZ) and accompanying forms and schedules.
[24] Based
on 2008 Income Statistics from the
[25] The Field Assistance Office is within the Wage and Investment Division Customer Assistance, Relationships, and Education function.
[26] The IRS database that maintains transactions or records of individual tax accounts.
[27] The Individual Return Transaction File contains data transcribed from U.S. Individual Income Tax Returns (Forms 1040, 1040A, and 1040EZ) and accompanying forms and schedules.
[28] Questions asked for verification or demographic purposes are not included in this Appendix.