Treasury
Inspector General for Tax Administration
Office of Audit
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
ARE PRODUCING POSITIVE RESULTS, BUT FURTHER IMPROVEMENTS ARE NEEDED TO THE
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS
Issued on September 3, 2010
Highlights
Highlights
of Report Number: 2010-40-109 to the Internal
Revenue Service Commissioner for the Wage and Investment Division.
IMPACT ON TAXPAYERS
The
Volunteer Program plays an important role in achieving the Internal Revenue
Service’s (IRS) goal of improving taxpayer service and facilitating
participation in the tax system. It
provides no‑cost Federal tax return preparation and electronic filing directed toward underserved segments
of individual taxpayers, including low‑income to moderate-income,
elderly, disabled, and limited-English-proficient taxpayers.
WHY TIGTA DID THE AUDIT
The
audit was a followup to prior TIGTA reviews to determine whether taxpayers receive quality service,
including the accurate preparation of their income tax returns, when visiting
Volunteer Program tax preparation sites.
WHAT TIGTA FOUND
The
accuracy rates for tax returns prepared at Volunteer Program sites increased
sharply from the 2009 Filing Season. The
increase is attributed to the increase in volunteer use of the Intake/Interview
and Quality Review Sheet (Form 13614-C), increased and improved training, and
increased oversight.
During
January 2010, the IRS implemented a process to
help ensure that willful acts of fraud will not occur at Volunteer Program sites. However, not all sites were aware of the
procedures or obtained the proper signage used to alert taxpayers of the
process to report improper activity.
Therefore, there was no assurance that all improper activities, if any,
were detected and reported to the IRS.
Resources
could be saved by reducing or eliminating paper reference materials when they
are available electronically. Each year
the IRS spends more than $600,000 ($3 million projected over five years)
to provide paper reference materials to volunteers, even though the tax
preparation software it provides has the same reference material.
Improvements are needed to the quality assurance process used to monitor program effectiveness. Results show that quality review procedures were not consistently followed and did not always conform to applicable guidelines. A random sample of 41 of the 184 Post Reviews showed that nine (22 percent) review files lacked sufficient taxpayer information to support the Reviewers’ conclusions.
WHAT TIGTA RECOMMENDED
TIGTA recommended that the IRS:
1) revise the site visit checksheet to
ensure volunteers and site coordinators understand the process and required
signs are posted; 2) ensure referrals reporting improper activities are
properly documented, investigated, and resolved; 3) develop an initiative to
help reduce or eliminate paper products at Volunteer Program sites; and 4)
revise the managerial checksheet used for
the Quality Statistical Sample Reviews to include a focus on tax return selection and documentation
standards.
The IRS
agreed with the recommendations and plans to revise the Field Site Visit
Checksheet to ensure volunteers and site coordinators understand the process
and that required signs are posted. It plans
to develop procedures to ensure referrals reporting improper activity are
documented, investigated, and resolved, and is currently developing strategies
to reduce volunteer tax return preparers’ reliance on paper products. It also plans to revise the managerial
checksheet to include a focus on tax return
selection and documentation standards.
READ THE
FULL REPORT
To view the report,
including the scope, methodology, and full IRS response, go to:
http://www.treas.gov/tigta/auditreports/2010reports/201040109fr.html.
Email Address: inquiries@tigta.treas.gov
Phone Number: 202-622-6500
Web Site:
http://www.tigta.gov