Treasury
Inspector General for Tax Administration
Office of Audit
THE TAXPAYER ADVOCATE SERVICE CAN
MORE EFFECTIVELY ENSURE LOW INCOME TAXPAYER CLINICS ARE APPROPRIATELY USING
GRANT FUNDS
Issued on July 19, 2011
Highlights
Highlights of Report Number: 2011-10-067 to the Internal Revenue Service National
Taxpayer Advocate.
IMPACT ON TAXPAYERS
The goal of the Low Income Taxpayer Clinic (LITC)
program is to provide low-income taxpayers who are involved in controversies
with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) with free or nominal cost legal
assistance and to provide taxpayers for whom English is a second language with
education on their taxpayer rights and responsibilities. Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) personnel did
not perform in-depth analyses during their site visits to the LITCs to
independently validate that the clinics met the legal requirements for the
funds received. Without performing
comprehensive reviews of the clinics, taxpayers cannot be assured that their
tax money is being used to assist qualified taxpayers involved in tax
controversies with the IRS, as intended by Congress.
WHY TIGTA DID THE AUDIT
This audit was initiated to evaluate the
actions taken by TAS management to improve the administration of the LITC grant
program and determine whether those actions resolved conditions identified in
prior TIGTA audits.
Congress designated the IRS to
provide administrative oversight and guidance for the LITC program. From this program’s inception in 1999 through
April 2003, the Wage and Investment Division had this responsibility within the
IRS. In May 2003, the IRS Commissioner
transferred this responsibility to the TAS.
WHAT TIGTA FOUND
Our review identified that while additional procedures
and controls have been implemented since our last audit, the TAS can take
additional actions to more effectively ensure the LITCs are using grant funds
appropriately. Specifically, TAS
personnel did not perform in-depth analyses during their site visits to the
LITCs to independently validate that the clinics met the program requirements
for the funds received. As a result,
there is an increased risk that clinics could be using taxpayer funds to assist
taxpayers in ways not intended by Congress.
TIGTA
also determined that TAS management has not implemented a process to prioritize
its visitations
and primarily visits new clinics or those that have not been visited in the
prior three years. A methodology where TAS personnel prioritize which
clinics to visit based on their analysis of available information could enable
the TAS to identify those clinics that may not be adhering to LITC program
requirements.
WHAT TIGTA RECOMMENDED
TIGTA recommended that the National Taxpayer Advocate
develop and implement revised procedures to require more comprehensive site
visits, require that all clinics capture
and maintain a minimum level of information to support income and controversy
determinations, and develop and document a process for identifying which
clinics will be selected for site visits.
In
their response, TAS management partially agreed with our recommendations. Management stated they have begun implementing significant
changes to the site assistance visit process.
However, they stated it would be inappropriate to verify client incomes and amounts
in controversy absent clear, specific statutory authority. Without this verification, TIGTA remains
concerned that the TAS is not fully ensuring that clinics are using taxpayer
funds for their intended purpose. Also,
the TAS did not agree to develop and document a formalized process
to identify clinics for visitation. TIGTA
believes that a documented process will assist the TAS in focusing its limited
resources on the clinics most in need of assistance and/or oversight.
READ THE
FULL REPORT
To view the report,
including the scope, methodology, and full IRS response, go
to:
http://www.treas.gov/tigta/auditreports/2011reports/201110067fr.html.
Email Address: TIGTACommunications@tigta.treas.gov
Phone
Number: 202-622-6500
Web Site: http://www.tigta.gov