October 2, 2006
FROM:
J. Russell George
Inspector General
The Reports Consolidation Act of 2000[1] requires that the Treasury Inspector General for
Tax Administration (TIGTA) summarize, for inclusion in the Department of the Treasury Accountability Report for
Fiscal Year 2006, its perspective of the most serious management and performance
challenges currently confronting the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
TIGTAs assessment
of the major IRS management challenge areas for Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 has not changed
substantially from the prior year. While the
IRS has continued to address each challenge area, TIGTA was unable to remove any challenge
area at this time. This year, TIGTA has
divided the category of Tax Compliance Initiatives into two subcategories Business
and Individual and Tax-Exempt Entities. TIGTA believes that these subcategories better
define the need to administer tax regulations and collect tax dollars for businesses and
individuals and to oversee compliance issues for tax-exempt entities. Both play a crucial role in the IRS
compliance efforts.
The 10 current
challenges, in order of priority, are:
The
Business Systems Modernization (BSM) program is a complex effort to modernize the
IRS technology and related business processes. According
to the IRS, this effort will involve integrating thousands of hardware and software
components. All of this must be done while
replacing outdated technology and maintaining the current tax system. The BSM program is in its eighth year and has
received approximately
$2.1 billion for contractor services. This
past year, the IRS began taking actions to restructure and redesign significant areas
within the BSM program. For example, the IRS
took over the role of systems integrator from the PRIME contractor[2] and changed its approach from completely replacing current
business systems to using current business systems to accomplish modernization.
While the
IRS and its contractors have completed modernization projects that provide significant
benefits to taxpayers, since FY 2002, TIGTAs annual assessments of the BSM program
have cited four specific challenges the IRS needs to overcome to deliver a successful
modernization effort: 1) implement planned
improvements in key management processes and commit necessary resources to enable success;
2) manage the increasing complexity and risks of the BSM program; 3) maintain the
continuity and strategic direction with experienced leadership; and 4) ensure that
contractor performance and accountability are effectively managed. TIGTA continues to
believe the eventual success of the modernization effort will depend on how well the IRS
addresses these four specific challenges.
Tax
compliance initiatives include the
need to administer tax regulations and collect the correct amount of tax for businesses
and individuals, as well as to oversee tax-exempt and government entities for compliance.
Business and Individual
Increasing compliance with the tax code is at the heart of IRS
enforcement programs. The IRS is targeting its
casework and enforcement activities to deliver better results and to better target those
corporations and high-income individual taxpayers who fail to report or pay what they owe. Despite actions the IRS has taken to
improve its enforcement efforts, TIGTA continues its designation of tax compliance
initiatives as a major management challenge for the IRS.
The IRS defines the gross tax gap as the difference between the estimated amount
taxpayers owe and the amount they voluntarily and timely pay for a tax year, and estimated
the gross tax gap for Tax Year 2001 at $345 billion. TIGTAs
evaluation of the reliability of the IRS-developed tax gap figures concluded that the IRS
still does not have sufficient information to completely and accurately assess the overall
tax gap and voluntary compliance. The IRS has
significant challenges in both obtaining complete and timely data, and developing the
methods for interpreting the data.
Tax-Exempt Entities
The IRS continues to face challenges
in administering programs focused on tax-exempt organizations to ensure that they comply
with applicable laws and regulations to qualify for tax-exempt status. While the IRS has noted that the nonprofit
community has not been immune from the recent trends toward bad corporate practices that
have been highlighted in the for-profit area, it has only recently begun to re-emphasize
this area since suffering a decline in staffing during the late 1990s. TIGTA has made recommendations for improving the
IRS oversight of filing compliance by political organizations and ensuring abusive tax
avoidance transactions in the tax-exempt sector are being identified and addressed. Further,
TIGTA recommended additional
improvements to assure that timely, accurate, and complete information returns are
received for employee benefit plans. TIGTA also noted that the IRS must develop better
research tools, improve training to trace funds through complex transactions, and develop the
ability to analyze data to determine the high-risk noncompliant areas. The IRS agreed with the TIGTA recommendations and
initiated corrective actions to address these concerns.
Millions
of taxpayers entrust the IRS with sensitive financial and personal data stored and
processed by IRS computer systems. Recent
reports of identity thefts from both the private and public sectors have heightened
awareness of the need to protect this data. The
risks that sensitive data or computer systems could be compromised and computer operations
could be disrupted continue to increase. These
risks are due to internal factors, such as the increased connectivity of the computer
systems and the increased use of portable laptop computers, and external factors, such as
the volatile threat environment resulting from increased terrorist and hacker activity. The IRS has designated computer security as a
material weakness under the Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act of 1982.[3] Section 301 of the
Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA)[4]
requires each Federal agency to report annually to the Office of Management and Budget and
Congress on the effectiveness of its security programs and to perform an annual
independent evaluation of its information security program and practices. During FY 2006, the IRS
developed a corporate approach to FISMA by elevating its FISMA processes and procedures
into an enterprise-wide program. Recognizing
that it will take time to achieve long-term improvements, the process changes made by the
IRS have not yet had a positive effect on some measurements provided in the Presidents Management Agenda, including
certification and accreditation and tracking the
resolution of security vulnerabilities. TIGTAs FISMA evaluations and other audits
lead to the conclusion that sufficient
attention is not yet being given to the security of sensitive systems.
Since the late 1990s, the IRS has
increased its delivery of quality customer service to taxpayers. In fact, in its current strategic plan, the
IRS first goal is to improve taxpayer service. There
are recent signs, however, that this trend may be reversing as the IRS proposes to
allocate more resources to its collection, examination, and criminal investigation
functions and fewer resources to taxpayer service functions.
Moreover, the IRS FY 2006 budget request proposed a 1 percent reduction in
funding for taxpayer service activities at the same time it proposed an 8 percent increase
in funding for enforcement activities.[5] The
Senate Committee on Appropriations recently noted that the IRS lacks a concrete plan to
provide adequate alternative services to replace the services proposed for reduction or
elimination.[6] In
response, the IRS developed a five-year Taxpayer Assistance Blueprint that will help it
focus on providing the appropriate types and amounts of service. TIGTA continues to identify the need for
improvements in taxpayer services provided through toll-free, face-to-face, and electronic
methods.
Simplicity, transparency, and ease of
administration are interrelated and desirable features of a tax system. Over the
years, the Federal tax system, especially the Federal income tax, has become more complex,
less transparent, and subject to frequent revision. Tax
system complexity and frequent revisions to the Internal Revenue Code make it more
difficult and costly for taxpayers who want to comply to do so and for the IRS to explain
and enforce the tax laws. Tax law complexity
results in higher costs for both tax administration and tax compliance. Simplification
and reform have the potential to reduce the tax gap by billions of dollars. Although the
IRS has consistently sought to ease the tax compliance process for all taxpayers, tax law
complexity remains a problem. The complexities
of the tax laws affect the ability of the IRS to administer the nations tax system. The IRS efforts to provide assistance to
taxpayers are hampered because of these complexities.
Without
meaningful simplification, it is likely that the complexities of the current tax code will
continue to contribute to the tax gap.
While the IRS
has made some progress in using performance and financial information for program and
budget decisions, this area is still a major challenge.
The IRS lacks a comprehensive, integrated system that provides accurate, relevant,
and timely financial and operating data describing the performance measures, productivity,
and associated costs of IRS programs. During FY
2005, the IRS collected about $2.3 trillion in Federal tax revenue, which constituted
approximately 95 percent of all Federal revenue. However,
the IRS Federal tax revenue financial management systems have serious internal
control and systems deficiencies, which require the IRS to rely extensively on
resource-intensive compensating processes to prepare its financial statements. Due to these serious conditions, the IRS did not,
in the Government Accountability Offices opinion, maintain effective internal
controls over financial reporting (including safeguarding of assets) or compliance with
laws and regulations. Thus, the IRS could not
provide reasonable assurance that losses, misstatements, and noncompliance with laws
material to the financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis.[7] In addition, the IRS cannot produce timely,
accurate, and useful information needed for day-to-day decisions, which inhibits the
IRS ability to address financial management and operational issues to fulfill its
responsibilities. TIGTA has
continued to report that various IRS management information systems are insufficient to
enable IRS management to measure costs, determine if performance goals have been achieved,
or monitor progress in achieving program goals.
An improper payment is any payment
that should not have been made or that was made in an incorrect amount under a statutory,
contractual, administrative or other legally applicable requirement. For the IRS, improper and erroneous payments
generally involve improperly paid refunds, tax return filing fraud, or overpayments to
vendors or contractors. Some tax credits, such as the Earned Income Tax
Credit (EITC) and the Education Credit, provide opportunities for abuse in income tax
claims. The
IRS estimated that between 27 percent and 32 percent of the $31 billion in EITC claimed on
TY 1999 returns should not have been paid.[8] The IRS Criminal Investigation
function is responsible for detecting and combating tax refund fraud through its
Questionable Refund Program (QRP), which was established
to address the serious problem of refund fraud, now estimated to exceed $500 million
annually. In past years,
it has been repeatedly reported that additional controls and procedures were necessary not
only to identify additional instances of potential fraud, but also to properly and timely
release refunds that are determined not to be fraudulent.[9] Recently,
the National Taxpayer Advocate criticized the IRS for unnecessarily stopping refunds
properly owed to taxpayers.[10] In
response to the National Taxpayer Advocates concern, on February 6, 2006, the IRS
announced that it is taking steps to improve the QRP and reduce the number of taxpayers
subject to frozen refunds. TIGTA is extremely concerned about this and believes that a
necessary balance must be struck between allowing sufficient time to detect fraudulent
claims and issuing timely refunds.
The IRS
continues to dedicate significant resources and attention toward implementing the taxpayer
rights provisions of the Internal
Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 (RRA 98)[11]. Audit reports
are mandated for the following taxpayer rights provisions:
·
Notice
of Levy
·
Restrictions on the Use of Enforcement Statistics to
Evaluate Employees
·
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Violations
·
Notice of Lien
·
Seizures
·
Illegal Protestor Designations
·
Assessment Statute of Limitations
·
Restrictions on Directly Contacting Taxpayers
Instead of Authorized Representatives
·
Separated or Divorced Joint Filer Requests
In general, the IRS has improved its compliance
with these statutory taxpayer rights provisions. For
example, based on TIGTA audit work, TIGTA believes the IRS efforts to ensure that
managers are not using enforcement statistics, production goals or quotas to evaluate
employees are generally effective and are helping to protect the rights of taxpayers. Nonetheless, there is still room for improvement
with respect to certain provisions. TIGTA
continues to identify instances in which there is no documentation that taxpayers were
advised of their rights regarding extensions to the tax assessment period. TIGTA also continues to identify instances in which
IRS employees refer to taxpayers as Illegal Tax Protesters or similar designations.
Some IRS management information systems do not
track specific cases. Thus, neither TIGTA nor
the IRS could evaluate the IRS compliance with certain RRA 98 provisions.
Each filing season tests the ability
of the IRS to implement tax law changes made by Congress. It
is during the filing season that most individuals file their income tax returns and call
the IRS if they have questions about specific tax laws or filing procedures. Correctly implementing tax law changes is a
continuing challenge because the IRS must identify the tax law changes; revise the
various tax forms,
instructions, and publications; and reprogram the computer systems used for processing
returns. Changes to the tax laws can have a
major effect on how the IRS conducts its activities, how many resources are required, and
how much progress can be made on strategic goals. Congress
frequently changes the tax laws, so some level of change is a normal part of the IRS
environment. However, certain types of changes
can significantly impact the IRS in terms of the quality and effectiveness of service and
in how taxpayers perceive the IRS. For
example, the 2006 Filing Season was an unusually difficult one for the IRS because there
were many late tax law changes in response to the hurricanes that struck the
Human capital
is a major challenge facing many agencies, and the Presidents Management Agenda
identifies Strategic Management of Human Capital as the first of five Government-wide
initiatives for improving Government performance. Like
many other Federal agencies, over the past several years the IRS has experienced workforce
challenges. Those challenges include
recruiting, training and retaining employees, as well as an increasing number of employees
who are eligible to retire. The Small
Business/Self-Employed and the Large and Mid-Size Business Divisions reported in their FY
2006 strategic assessments that the human capital crisis continues to intensify as
employees in key occupational series increasingly become eligible to retire, are lost
through attrition, or migrate to other business divisions.
While the IRS has made some progress, the strategic management of human capital
remains one of the IRS major management challenge areas. TIGTA has made a significant number of
recommendations for improvement in the areas of recruiting, workforce planning, delivery
of training, and employee turnover. The IRS
agreed with TIGTA recommendations and is taking corrective actions. TIGTA will continue to
provide coverage of this major management challenge.
Conclusion
These are the
10 major IRS management challenge issues for FY 2006.
TIGTAs FY 2007
Annual Audit Plan categorizes its planned audits by these challenges. If you have questions or wish to
discussTIGTAs views on these management and performance challenges in greater
detail, please contact me at (202) 622-6500.
cc: The Deputy Secretary
Assistant Secretary for Management and Chief Financial Officer
Commissioner of
Internal Revenue
[1] 31 U.S.C. § 3516(d) (2000).
[2] The PRIME contractor is the Computer Sciences Corporation, which heads an alliance of leading technology companies brought together to assist with the IRS efforts to modernize its computer systems and related information technology.
[3] 31
U.S.C. §§ 1105, 1113, 3512 (2000).
[4] Pub. L. No. 107-347, tit. III, Stat. 2899, 2946 (2002) (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. §§ 3541-49).
[5] The Budget in Brief: Internal Revenue Service (Feb. 2005).
[6]
[7]
Government Accountability Office (GAO), Pub. No. GAO-06-137, Financial Audit: IRSs
Fiscal Years 2005 and 2004 Financial Statement (Nov. 2005).
[8] Treasury Inspector General for Tax
Administration (TIGTA), Ref. No. 2005-40-093, The Earned Income Tax Credit Income
Verification Test Was Properly Conducted (May 2005).
[9] Audit
reports previously issued by TIGTA: Ref. No.
2004-40-018, The Internal Revenue Service Can
Improve the Effectiveness of Questionable Refund Detection Team Activities (Dec.
1999); Ref. No. 2001-40-025, Revised Questionable
Refund Program Procedures Were Not Consistently Implemented (Jan. 2001);
Ref. No. 2003-10-094, Improvements Are Needed in
the Monitoring of Criminal Investigation Controls Placed on Taxpayers Accounts When
Refund Fraud Is Suspected (Mar. 2003); and Ref. No. 2005-10-164, The Internal Revenue Service Needs to Do More to Stop
the Millions of Dollars in Fraudulent Refunds Paid to Prisoners (Sept.
2005).
[10] National Taxpayer Advocate 2005 Annual Report to Congress (Dec. 2005).
[11] Pub. L. No. 105-206, 112 Stat. 685 (Codified
as amended in scatter sections of 2 U.S.C., 5 U.S.C. App., 16 U.S.C., 19 U.S.C., 23
U.S.C., 26 U.S.C., 31 U.S.C., 38 U.S.C., and 49 U.S.C.).
[12] Pub. L. No. 109-135, 199 Stat. 2577.